No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
<!-- do not remove this --> | <!-- do not remove this --> | ||
<div id=" | <div id="Martyna comment 04" class="comment"> | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
''Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic?'' | |||
''Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic? | ''aesthetical VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical? | ||
aesthetical VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical? | |||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 31 January 2024
Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic? aesthetical VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical?