(Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{Esther-Kendal02}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> It is common that radical imaginaries (new ideas/aesthetics) either die or move to central imaginaries (normalised ideas) (look at Ernst and Schröter Media Futures and their interpretation of Cornelius Castoriadis' theory of imagination). What are ways of keeping new radical imaginaries radical? And why would we want to? What does stabile r...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
<!-- do not remove this --> | <!-- do not remove this --> | ||
<div id=" | <div id="Esther-Kendal02" class="comment"> | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:23, 1 February 2024
It is common that radical imaginaries (new ideas/aesthetics) either die or move to central imaginaries (normalised ideas) (look at Ernst and Schröter Media Futures and their interpretation of Cornelius Castoriadis' theory of imagination). What are ways of keeping new radical imaginaries radical? And why would we want to? What does stabile radical but also consistent imaginary bring us (socially? or politically?) if it is not normalised?