No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
<!-- do not remove this --> | <!-- do not remove this --> | ||
<div id=" | <div id="Martyna Comment 01" class="comment"> | ||
<!------------------------> | <!------------------------> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 31 January 2024
The idea of being in a 'crisis of imagination' reoccurs in other works (see: xenodataset, morphologies of flatness). How can technologies (like image or language generation by statistical modelling, for example) have an implicit imaginary within (rather than just preventing us from imagining)? Statistical modelling doesn't only prevent imagining, but also presents an infrastructuring of imagination... how are they an imaginary?