ComputerLars (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Most politicians only have oppinions that are sort of already allowed, e.g. on the Israel-Gaza war or the royal family. Does The Synthetic Party understand and represent the patterns of opportunistic pragmatics, or will it stay steeped in the maginal politics it was trained on?") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!------------------------> | |||
<!-- do not remove this --> | |||
<div id="AskerComment13" class="comment asker-comment"> | |||
<!------------------------> | |||
Most politicians only have oppinions that are sort of already allowed, e.g. on the Israel-Gaza war or the royal family. Does The Synthetic Party understand and represent the patterns of opportunistic pragmatics, or will it stay steeped in the maginal politics it was trained on? | Most politicians only have oppinions that are sort of already allowed, e.g. on the Israel-Gaza war or the royal family. Does The Synthetic Party understand and represent the patterns of opportunistic pragmatics, or will it stay steeped in the maginal politics it was trained on? | ||
<!------------------------> | |||
<!-- do not remove this --> | |||
</div> | |||
[[Category:Content form - comment]] | |||
<!------------------------> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:40, 1 February 2024
Most politicians only have oppinions that are sort of already allowed, e.g. on the Israel-Gaza war or the royal family. Does The Synthetic Party understand and represent the patterns of opportunistic pragmatics, or will it stay steeped in the maginal politics it was trained on?