Martyna Comment 01: Difference between revisions

This page was last edited on 31 January 2024, at 16:11.
(Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> The idea of being in a 'crisis of imagination' reoccurs in other works (see: ''xenodataset'', ''morphologies of flatness''). ''How can technologies (like image or language generation by statistical modelling, for example) have an implicit imaginary within (rather than just preventing us from imagining)? Statistical modelling doesn't only prevent...")
 
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!------------------------>
<!------------------------>
<!-- do not remove this -->
<!-- do not remove this -->
<div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment">
<div id="Martyna Comment 01" class="comment">
<!------------------------>
<!------------------------>






The idea of being in a 'crisis of imagination' reoccurs in other works (see: ''xenodataset'', ''morphologies of flatness''). ''How can technologies (like image or language generation by statistical modelling, for example) have an implicit imaginary within (rather than just preventing us from imagining)? Statistical modelling doesn't only prevent imagining, but also presents an infrastucturing of imagination ... how they are an imaginary?''  
The idea of being in a 'crisis of imagination' reoccurs in other works (see: ''xenodataset'', ''morphologies of flatness''). ''How can technologies (like image or language generation by statistical modelling, for example) have an implicit imaginary within (rather than just preventing us from imagining)? Statistical modelling doesn't only prevent imagining, but also presents an infrastructuring of imagination... how are they an imaginary?''  





Latest revision as of 16:11, 31 January 2024


The idea of being in a 'crisis of imagination' reoccurs in other works (see: xenodataset, morphologies of flatness). How can technologies (like image or language generation by statistical modelling, for example) have an implicit imaginary within (rather than just preventing us from imagining)? Statistical modelling doesn't only prevent imagining, but also presents an infrastructuring of imagination... how are they an imaginary?