Martyna comment 04: Difference between revisions

This page was last edited on 31 January 2024, at 16:12.
(Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="Creating Martyna comment 04" class="comment"> <!------------------------> ''Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic? aestheticval VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!------------------------>
<!------------------------>
<!-- do not remove this -->
<!-- do not remove this -->
<div id="Creating Martyna comment 04" class="comment">
<div id="Martyna comment 04" class="comment">
<!------------------------>
<!------------------------>




 
''Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic?''
''Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic?
''aesthetical VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical?  
aestheticval VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical? answer "language of visual literacy"''





Latest revision as of 16:12, 31 January 2024


Dilemma is the interesting point - aesthetics/form from evidential images does not speak to the content? What do you propose as a different aesthetic? aesthetical VS political: does analysis of regimes of perception help us understand misinformation better? or redefine misinformation? or is there another desired political result? or didactical?