User contributions for Marie Naja

Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

31 January 2024

  • 14:2314:23, 31 January 2024 diff hist +37 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary
  • 14:1114:11, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie 8No edit summary current
  • 14:1114:11, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie 7No edit summary current
  • 14:1014:10, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie 6No edit summary current
  • 14:1014:10, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie comment5No edit summary current
  • 14:1014:10, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie comment4No edit summary current
  • 14:0914:09, 31 January 2024 diff hist −15 Marie comment3No edit summary current
  • 14:0914:09, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie comment2No edit summary current
  • 14:0814:08, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie comment1No edit summary current
  • 14:0814:08, 31 January 2024 diff hist −15 Marie 12No edit summary current
  • 14:0714:07, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie 11No edit summary current
  • 14:0614:06, 31 January 2024 diff hist −13 Marie 10No edit summary current
  • 14:0314:03, 31 January 2024 diff hist +23 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary
  • 11:3811:38, 31 January 2024 diff hist +89 Content-Form/Bibliography/MarieNo edit summary
  • 11:3511:35, 31 January 2024 diff hist −1 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary
  • 11:3211:32, 31 January 2024 diff hist +145 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary
  • 11:2811:28, 31 January 2024 diff hist +26 N File:Rosler Balloons 72dpi 1000px.jpgNo edit summary current
  • 11:2511:25, 31 January 2024 diff hist +31 N File:Image analysis of gaza hospital.jpgNo edit summary current
  • 11:2311:23, 31 January 2024 diff hist +64 N File:Still-image .pngNo edit summary current
  • 11:0611:06, 31 January 2024 diff hist +492 N Marie 12Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Images cannot be separated from context (as mentioned) but also the wide infrastructure - images are relational assemblages for example. Any analysis would need to include this. What metrics might be used to gage perception? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment <!--------..."
  • 11:0511:05, 31 January 2024 diff hist +406 N Marie 11Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Blurring of content is interesting – ’click to unblur’ is a strange practice as often you are not aware what you are consenting to see <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment <!------------------------>"
  • 11:0311:03, 31 January 2024 diff hist +414 N Marie 10Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> what does this staging do to bodies on/behind the image in contrast to more spontaneous pictures of people who are less aware of being photographed? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment <!------------------------>"
  • 11:0311:03, 31 January 2024 diff hist +319 N Marie 9Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> can we read imagined audience by analysing the image? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment <!------------------------>"
  • 11:0211:02, 31 January 2024 diff hist +519 N Marie 8Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Are any images of conflict unstaged? All images are taken with the intention of 'proving' a perspective which is more or less effective/soporiphic/numbing/alarming (we can distinguish between staging by a photoprapher and staging by people in the frame) <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content f..."
  • 11:0111:01, 31 January 2024 diff hist +519 N Marie 7Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Are any images of conflict unstaged? All images are taken with the intention of 'proving' a perspective which is more or less effective/soporiphic/numbing/alarming (we can distinguish between staging by a photoprapher and staging by people in the frame) <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content f..."
  • 10:5510:55, 31 January 2024 diff hist +409 N Marie 6Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> The text seems to raise the question: can it be authentic and staged intentionally at the same time? what was the intention behind the staging? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment <!------------------------>"
  • 10:0910:09, 31 January 2024 diff hist +38 Content-Form/Bibliography/MarieNo edit summary
  • 10:0610:06, 31 January 2024 diff hist +447 Content-Form/Bibliography/MarieNo edit summary
  • 10:0410:04, 31 January 2024 diff hist −431 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary Tag: Visual edit
  • 09:5509:55, 31 January 2024 diff hist +476 N Marie comment 11Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> Images cannot be separated from context (as mentioned) but also the wide infrastructure - images are relational assemblages for example. Any analysis would need to include this. What metrics might be used to gage perception? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - wiki-spam <!------------------------>" current
  • 09:5409:54, 31 January 2024 diff hist +392 N Marie comment 10Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> Blurring of content is interesting – ’click to unblur’ is a strange practice as often you are not aware what you are consenting to see <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - wiki-spam <!------------------------>" current
  • 09:5309:53, 31 January 2024 diff hist +400 N Marie comment 9Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> what does this staging do to bodies on/behind the image in contrast to more spontaneous pictures of people who are less aware of being photographed? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - wiki-spam <!------------------------>" current
  • 09:5209:52, 31 January 2024 diff hist +305 N Marie comment 8Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> can we read imagined audience by analysing the image? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - wiki-spam <!------------------------>" current
  • 09:5109:51, 31 January 2024 diff hist +505 N Marie comment 7Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> Are any images of conflict unstaged? All images are taken with the intention of 'proving' a perspective which is more or less effective/soporiphic/numbing/alarming (we can distinguish between staging by a photoprapher and staging by people in the frame) <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> [[Category:Content form - wiki-spam]..." current
  • 09:5009:50, 31 January 2024 diff hist +395 N Marie coment 6Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div class="wiki-spam"> <!------------------------> The text seems to raise the question: can it be authentic and staged intentionally at the same time? what was the intention behind the staging? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - wiki-spam <!------------------------>" current
  • 09:4909:49, 31 January 2024 diff hist +553 N Marie comment5Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> what is authenticity? what is the value assigned by us when we name something as "authentic"? is it an aesthetical experience or experience of "truthfulness"/"believability"? is it important who shapes choreography of a picture (photographer or people on the picture/behind the picture)? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove thi..."
  • 09:4809:48, 31 January 2024 diff hist +766 N Marie comment4Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Questions: what is the role of this media choreography in the image as a document? How does the performativity of a staged, scripted reality impact the "exhibition value" of war? And how does it impact the image's status as a document? I think a reading through a Benjamin lens is interesting along the lines of the massification of images but p..."
  • 09:4809:48, 31 January 2024 diff hist +1,134 N Marie comment3Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Firstly, it really resonates with me on a broader plane of circulation of war images on social media because lately I've been thinking a lot about the ethics of this (for clear reasons). But beyond ethics of representation, when I started reading, I immediately started thinking about documentary practices in art (and visual culture) and it..."
  • 09:4709:47, 31 January 2024 diff hist +572 N Marie comment2Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> Very interesting analysis! It makes me think about the "staged event" in relation to "the waltz of content", as we are being submerged with content, and so I wonder what the conditions under which the staging can be recognized? What's the role of public/reception/users in giving a status to that staging? <!------------------------> <!-..."
  • 09:4609:46, 31 January 2024 diff hist +502 N Marie comment1Created page with "<!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> <div id="{{PAGENAME}}" class="comment"> <!------------------------> It reminded me to the fashion campaign that the brand Zara launched this year and few months afterwards they withdrew it and apologised. In this case would it could be called "the meta-choreography of war". An intertextuality of images? <!------------------------> <!-- do not remove this --> </div> Category:Content form - comment..."
  • 08:1008:10, 31 January 2024 diff hist +15 Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasNo edit summary

30 January 2024

26 January 2024

15 January 2024

  • 08:4208:42, 15 January 2024 diff hist +3,015 N Marie Naja Lauritzen DiasCreated page with "'''The choreography of war''' Since Jean Baudrillard’s provoking claim that ‘the Gulf War did not take place’ warfare has been associated with illusion . Today’s hyper-medialized warfare raises new questions about conflicts of reception and truth value in the images we see. We're accustomed to seeing distant wars through fragmented snapshots, often captured amid the disorder of conflict via news media or blurry "poor images" shared via camera phones . Such alleg..."

13 January 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)